Few topics spark as much debate at family gatherings as the divisive 2016 election of Donald Trump which deeply polarized the nation and continues to occupy public discourse.
–
However, an equally contentious issue is whether the United States of America is fundamentally a Christian nation.
–
To provide some personal context to add to this post that may help one understand why I’ve even decided to go into this topic..

I once resided in an affluent Jewish neighborhood along the beach in Southern California. My neighbors were predominantly professionals in finance or law, including my next-door neighbor, who was a professor of law.
–
After conversing with him on five occasions—and upon our first meeting, during which he referred to me as a “good blue-collar worker”—he shared a strong opinion with me.
–
One afternoon in the alley, he exclaimed, “America is a DEMOCRACY!! There is no religion in the Constitution. There is no religion associated with America,” before retreating indoors.
–
I held him in high regard. Having a law professor as a neighbor was a fortunate circumstance, and we even discussed collaborating on YouTube videos modeled after Jordan Peterson’s psychology lectures, but adapted for his law courses.
–
Nevertheless, his statement left me puzzled. I had always believed the United States to be a Christian nation and a Republic, and I recalled numerous debates on these points throughout my life.
–
The assertion did not sit well with me, though we maintained a cordial relationship until I eventually relocated.
–
At that time, I had never deeply explored the Constitution, engaged in political discussions, delved into conspiracy theories, or studied the events surrounding Abraham Lincoln that contributed to ongoing national divisions.
–
It was this law professor who ignited my curiosity, prompting me to examine primary sources such as the Annals of Congress, the Congressional Record, the Congressional Globe, the Constitution itself, the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), and the United States Code (USC).
–
I was convinced he was mistaken.
–
In fact, I came to view him as an adversary in this context.
–
Prior to his role as a professor, he had been a prominent attorney for Microsoft, commanding $750,000 retainers and averaging $1.1 million per case.
–
Before that, he specialized in water rights law — a field that, for those familiar with it, involves significant complexities and implications.
–
He represents one of the individuals in America today whose professional role involves interpreting and influencing the Constitution and related legal frameworks in ways that can be seen as manipulative.

And we’ve come to an area where there’s no greater twisting and squeezing of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights that has occurred, and that is in the area of RELIGION.
–
There has been and continues to be, all-out war waged against the constitutional validity of America being a Christian nation, so let us take a look– let us examine the question of whether or not America is constitutionally: A Christian Nation. An excerpt by the late Dr. John Coleman.
–

After WWII, the Supreme Court began to depart from the Christian heritage of America as established by our Founding Fathers– and you can ignore the red herring of Masonry– so often drug out there across the American trail to divert attention from the truth that WE ARE a Christian country.
–
And began its Socialist interpretations of “freedom of religion,” instituting pagan ideas, usurping legislative powers to which it was not entitled, in order to bring about the Socialist changes desired by the Democrat (Communist) Party and its Communist leader, Franklin D Roosevelt.

–

The twisting and squeezing by justices of the courts to destroy the constitutionality of America being a Christian nation — a virtual rebellion against the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, took root in this period of intense twisting and squeezing in which Socialist/Marxist/Communist Justices Frankfurter, Douglas, Brennan, Fortass, Brandeiss, Burger and Warren became the standard bearers of the Communist revolution against the Constitution; their relentless twisting and squeezing of it will go down in the history of how to subdue a nation without resorting to force of arms.

Is America a Christian Nation?

–

Justice Brewer said so in 1905:

“This Repulic is classified among the Christian nations of the world.
It was formally declared by the Supreme Court in the case of Holy Trinity Church vs United States 143-U.S. 471.

–
That court, after mentioning various circumstances, added, ‘these and many other matters which might be noticed, add a volume of unofficial declarations to the mass of organic utterances, that this is a Christian nation. We constantly speak of the nation as a Christian nation — in fact as the leading Christian nation of the world. This popular use of the term certainly has significance. It is not a mere creation of the imagination. It is not a term of derision but has a substantial basis — one which justifies its use.'”
–
The great constitutional scholar Justic Joseph Story in his “Commentaries on the United States Constitution” explained the matter thus:
–
“…and of the first amendment to it.. the general if not universal sentiment in America wasa, that Christianity ought to receive encouragement from the state so far as it was no incompatible with the private right of the conscience and the freedom of religious worship. An attempt to level all religions, and to make it a matter of state policy to hold all in utter indifference would have created universal disapprobation, if not universal indignation.. the real object of the Amendment was not to countenance. Much less advance Muhammadanism, or Judaism or infidelity by prostrating Christianity, but to exclude rivalry among Christian sects, and to prevent a national ecclesiastical establishment which should give to a hierarchy the exclusive patronage of the national government.”

–
There is no such thing as “Separation of Church and State” in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
–
There is little doubt that the Founding Fathers, 55 anglo-saxon men, always intended that the U.S. be known as a Christian nation, yet the Liberal-Napoleonic Code Courts with which we are saddled, consistently attempt to twist and squeeze the Constitution in contending against what is already established, and as the Prophet Isaiah said:
–
“…We have conceived lies in our hearts and repeated them in slanderous, treacherous words. Justice is rebuffed and flouted while rightousness stand aloof; truth stumbles in the market place and honesty is kept out of cour, so truth is lost to sight, and whomever shuns eveil is thought a madman.” (Isaiah 59:13-15).
–
Liberalism in the courts is a heresy, as is twisting and squeezing the Constitution in attempting to alter it by what the Marxist, Zinoviev, called “the legislative route”.
–
Legislative action means judges acting as legislators, and it also means the Executive Branch issueing unconstitutional proclamations known as “Executive Orders” on the premise that they will correct some imagined religious, political, moral and/or economic wrong.
–
In reality, executive orders are steps to centralize government or destroy the proper functioning of the Constitution through the separation of powers.
–
Continuing w/ their program of twisting and squeezing the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, we hear the Socialist/Marxist/Communist legislators talking about “Federal Courts”.
–
There is no such thing as “Federal Courts” or “Federal Judges” mentioned in the Constitution, at least not as far as I could find.
–

So, it would seem to me that such courts and judges are a prohibition, an inhibition of unconstitutional powers.
–
There is absolutely nothing in the Constitution that would permit the “Federal courts” to have the draconian powers they presently exercise.
–
Politically appointed “Federal judges” who are not elected by We, the People, and their “courts”; are instruments of TYRANNY.
–
Placing authority of government in their hands, which power they often misuse to alter the Constitution by twisting and squeezing, which was never intended by the Founding Fathers.
–
Today, a single “Federal judge” can prevent the will of the legislature and WE, the People. This is rule by judicial fiat by political “Federal” judges, tyranny worse than anything encountered in the former USSR. The current and growing abuse of the court system to impose tyranny upon We, the People was anticipated by the Founding Fathers
–
Thomas Jefferson:
–
“The Constitution, on this hypothesis is a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary, what they may twist and shape into any form.”
–
I had mentioned in the post on Executive Orders are Unconstitutional, that the reason why the 9th Amendment was passed was to prevent this massive and growing twisting and squeezing of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights from happening.
–
Courts today ignore this check on tyrannical conduct.
–
The majority of “Federal judges” have turned into these political activists, whose rulings constitute ‘new laws’ not passed by the legislature.
–
No judicial courts, nor judges, have existed in America since 1789. Executive Administrators, not Judges, enforce Statutes and Codes.
FRC v. GE, 281 US 464, Keller v PE, 261 US 428, 1 Stat. 138-178.
–
See also the 11th Amendment. This was the abolishment of all inferior courts to hear cases of law or equity (this means that all courts below the “one supreme courts”, not the U.S. Supreme Court.)
–
Also note you won’t be able to use the U.S. Constitution to defend yourself personally, because you are not a party to it. You would use the Bill of Rights instead. You can read more about that at Padelford Fay & Co v. The Mayor and Alderman of the City of Savannah, 14 Georgia 438, 520.
–
All these new laws passed by the legislature, most are non-Christian, unconstitutional, socialistic rulings. Think LGBTQ rights. What rights weren’t already inherent in the Constitution and Bill of Rights?? Trans rights, women’s rights, minority rights, everything but Christian rights. It’s ok to mock, hate, spit, etc. You would be shocked when you look up the number of churches alone that have been burned in America, just in the last 10 years.
–
These “judges” interfere in matters reserved to the States under the 10th Amendment, often to ordering what type of persons must be employed by local boards, and what books school boards are allowed to include in curriculum and school libraries.
–
It appears that the Founding Fathers anticipated this tyrannical twisting and squeezing of the Constitution by all these “Federal” courts– that one day if it were to happen– they provided a remedy to stop it prior.
–
In the case of Church of the Holy Trinity vs. the U.S. Justice David Brewer ruled:

–
“…general Christianity is, and always has been, a part of the common law of Pennsylvania.”
–
In the case of People vs Ruggles, Chancellor Kent, chief justice of the Supreme Court of New York State said “…we are a Christian people and the morality of the country is deeply ingrafted upon Christianity and not upon the worship of impostors.” One would conclude that ‘imposters’ would mean any other religions.
–
Page 12931: Florence Kelly, confidant of Roosevelt and his wife Eleanor, pressed the issue of Socializing the United States.. After she returned from England and Germany where she was propped by the Socialists and Marxists, Kelly received a letter from Karl Marx dated January 27, 1887, in which he instructed her how to Socialize education in America and how to introduce “Socialism” quote: “Into the flesh and blood of Americans”.
–
These instructions became the blueprint of the Democrat party in its plans to Socialize education, and have followed diligently ever since. Why do 99.9% of teachers vote Democrat?? Cha-ching. Bingo.